Adoption, Children's Privacy, Children's Rights, Human Rights, Photograph of Children on the Web

Posting of Children’s Photographs on Adoption Websites…

In follow up of my research on adoption (please see details) I would like to initiate a debate in order to raise greater awareness and bring about a policy change with regards to the use of children’s photographs on various adoption websites and with the hope of an eventual ethical shift and policy statement in relation to this matter.

I believe that the current practice of posting children’s photographs on various adoption websites violates their privacy and basic human rights for the following reasons:

1.  There is no ethically valid reason why the prospective parents need to have an immediate visual image of the child, except to guide their selection based on children’s appearances. This is not far from catalogue shopping for a “picture perfect family”. There is much evidence that choices made/influenced by appearance run into complications further down the line. It is instead more appropriate to have a clear interest on the part of possible prospective parents and to ensure that there could be a match between the child’s needs and what the family can offer before sharing the children’s photographs.

2.  Images of children on the web serve to perpetuate the discrimination in favour of white children.

3. These children are often at an age that they are not able to provide consent and/or understand the full and long-term implications of their pictures being posted/circulated on the web.

4. Considering that the information and images posted on the web can hardly be fully removed from the public domain afterwards, posting of children’s photographs on various adoption websites violates their right to privacy in an almost irreversible manner.

5.  Individuals (both children and adults) at times do not wish to reveal that they were adopted, and it is, and should be, their choice and privilege whether to reveal that information. How can they have that choice once their photographs have been openly posted and paraded on various picture galleries on the web?

6.  We will never think of posting the picture of an adult who is facing a crisis, or in need of assistance, or is homeless, etc. on the web without their explicit permission and informed consent. Given the irreversible impact of such postings on children’s privacy and life narrative, why do we think that we can make such an important decision on their behalf?

7.  There is no doubt we must find these children a home and family in the most appropriate and immediate manner. However, instead of open posting of children’s photographs on the web, would it not be better to provide a textual description of the child and his/her background and only after an expression of interest and concrete possiblity of matching the child with a prospective family then share their photographs with that specific family.

To increase the number of adoptive parents we must raise general awareness with regards to the current situation and the challenges and difficulties faced by these children as well as our collective social, ethical and moral responsibility toward it.

Such a campaign could be quite effective and definitely much more ethical than the picture galleries of “waiting children” on the web or the parading of children in “Adoption Fairs” where children literally walk a runway as they are presented to prospective parents. Current practices have significant and lasting impact on children’s psyche and identity, and are tantamount to commodification of children’s affect.

We must develop much greater regard for children’s dignity and integrity as well as their fundamental human rights.

The varous organizations and their websites that engage the noble work of finding families for these children should find equally noble means and noble ways for achieving their noble goals.

If you are in favour of legislation and/or policy to stop the exploitative posting of children’s photographs on the web and to regulate the current practice, please join us on our LinkedIn group at http://tiny.cc/rhe3j and/or express your support by adding your comment here. You can also join my new twitter account (http://twitter.com/claudiamegele  @claudiamegele) to express your support.

We can change the status quo if we join forces.

Advertisements

Discussion

6 thoughts on “Posting of Children’s Photographs on Adoption Websites…

  1. I agree, Claudia, this practice raises all sorts of ethical issues. Nice blog!
    This is also a problem in the field of raising awareness & money for people with disabilities. NGOs and funding organizations often consider this the most effective way to initiate donations, namely by showing people and children with a delabitating disease at their worst states … With that one might raise money, but at the same time one is convoluting to the stigmatization of these individuals and the whole community of disabled people as incapable of living fulfilling and ‘productive’ lives.

    Posted by Liana Giorgi | July 6, 2011, 4:22 pm
  2. Couldn’t agree more. Thanks for bringing these issues to attention.

    Posted by cb | July 10, 2011, 6:51 pm
  3. From the perspective of the prospective adopter it helps to have a visual image in their mind when considering the details of the child. Anything which makes it easier for adopters will make for more adoptions.

    Posted by Jonathan Davis | July 11, 2011, 8:37 am
  4. Hi Jonathan,
    One of the problems is when parents decide based on the photographs of children rather than based on other much more important aspects.
    In fact, I know of specific local authorities who used to share children’s photographs unrestrictedly, but, due to the number of failed adoptions decide to modify their policy.
    Pictures of children awaiting adoption should not be paraded in picture galleries on the web enabling some parents to go catalogue shopping for a “picture perfect family”.
    Children’s photographs should be shared confidentially and only with parents who have expressed an interest in the child based on the child’s textual story and life narrative.
    All the best,
    Claudia

    Posted by Claudia | July 11, 2011, 12:45 pm
  5. Again I come to this as a) directly experienced in this issue and b) from a ‘small govt’ point of view. Simply put as I said ‘Anything which makes it easier for adopters will make for more adoptions.’
    The more you muddy the issue the fewer the adoptions will happen – the more kids will languish in long term care. That is the reality irresepective of the ‘ideal’.
    I am no fan of Reagan however he did make one smart remark often quoted. The 4 most feared words to hear: I’m from the govt and I’M HERE TO HELP.

    Posted by Jonathan Davis | July 11, 2011, 12:54 pm
    • Suggesting adoption agencies use an alternate method of increasing the number of adoptions than one which leads to the comodification of children and, subsequently, an increased risk of abuse of their abuse, is not ‘muddying the waters’. Suggesting that adoption agencies should try to find alternate ways to connect with prospective adoptive parents will not lead to ‘more children languishing in care’. Just because you are in ‘small gov’t’ there is no excuse for hyperbole.

      Posted by Christopher Oxley | August 12, 2013, 5:24 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 9 other followers

Mental Health Chat

For regular updates Follow me on Twitter

%d bloggers like this: